lunes, 21 de marzo de 2016

ANTI-SUFFRAGE PUBLICITY







The Suffragist movement was one of the most important movements in the woman’s History. To get their rights they used mainly two ways:  newspapers and publicity.

It was a way of calling the attention of all the citizens. They used the influence that the newspapers were exercising on the people to be made know and to attract to more supporters. In addition, they used also postcards as part of the campaign for the women’s rights to vote. The postcards got the messages of the movement across in short, clear, and often humours ways.

Many of this publicity was clear in some newspapers managed by women suffragist, as the Woman’s Journal, an American weekly suffragist periodical by Lucy Stone and her husband devoted to the interests of woman (her educational, industrial, legal and political equality)

But it was not enough to have supporters. In fact, it was a way to get enemies. There were a lot of them that thought that women were a danger for the society and they were acting against the nature. For this raison, those opposed to women’s suffrage also used postcards to get their message out to the public, showing the figures of the women in a humourist way.

We can find a lot of this postcards in the Palczewski Postcard Archive at the University of Northern Iow who has a number of great examples that illustrate the frames used to present women’s full political participation as threatening.
Postcards issued by other groups reflect these same themes. The clear message is that giving women the right to vote threatens men, the family, and the entire natural order of things


   




















From an actual point of view ,we have found these postcards so interesting. They show an other different world totally unimaginable  for the mentality of that epoch but a way of life totally adapted in ours. In that world we find families without fathers, only with the figure of the women as authority; fathers participating in childcare and in the housework; women being the sustenance to the family; women being leaders in politic or taking jobs reserved only for men.

 Some postcards show women expressing opinions and wearing trousers (the "Pantalette Suffragette") in ways that are threatening men's face and social order. If these images were presented without context, a modern viewer might assume that they must be "pro" women's suffrage images, because they represent things that are compatible with mainstream values today.  

This collection of postcards essentially shows us the world that we live in. We can say  they predicted that Women's Suffrage would lead the new style-life, even if men were against it.

BIBLIOGRAPHY: 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario